Had a Nice Little Vacation

Dear Ms. Feverfew -

I took a little sabatical over the past couple of weeks. I needed a break from all the bloggity-drama. You know that silly life some folks accuse me of not having? Well, I actually have one and it has been pretty busy these past couple of weeks. Frankly, I didn’t have time to babysit this blog. Perhaps I could have just disabled comments, but I needed some time to just rest and regroup as well. And rest and regroup I did. It has been a productive 14 days.

Among the other various duties I perform as a mother of three and active member of my church and community, I read a number of books. Here’s the list in no particular order:

Yes, I really read that many books in the past 14 days. Don’t hate me for it. If rumors are true, you are a voracious reader as well. But it isn’t the number that is important, it is the content of the books, particularly the ones about ambiguous loss and mothers and daughters.  They have helped validate my experience as a mother who lost her child to adoption and the subsequent years of unsupported grief brought about by this ambiguous loss. I *highly* recommend them to any natural parent or adoptee who is struggling with unsupported and disenfranchised grief, especially in a culture that celebrates adoption loss and dresses it up with unenforceable post-adoption platitudes and monthly “care” packages for birth mothers.

I have more to say but it’s late and my husband just popped up on Skype so I am going to go chat with him for a bit and then go to bed. I just thought I would let you know that I still love you, I still think you deserve unfettered access to your original birth certificate and adoption records, and I still think adoption in the United States needs some serious reform.

Much love,

M.

Yes, this is for you JS

J -

I did what you begged of me -  I removed the post. Now it is time to call off your attack dogs. They have no business tracking down my daughter, her parents, my Bishop, or any other such thing. I issued a very public and heartfelt apology. Obviously, that wasn’t enough for you, since you have not even acknowledged it and are having other people do your “dirty” work for you.

If this is how you want to play this game, I will put the post back up. While I feel badly about how I delivered the message, the comments in that section reveal something about you and your friends the entire world needs to know about. I can stand behind my words, but you didn’t want everyone to read yours or the comments left by your friends. If they can’t leave this alone, then I will put it back up. I am trying to be gracious in this matter, but leave my daughter and her family out of this. This isn’t about them.

M.

About JS: Why I Apologized & Why I Made the Original Post Private

  1. It was the right thing to do. Sure, I didn’t technically “have” to do it, but I did it anyway. Love it or hate it, it is what it is.  I still stand by my original message: Adoptees matter and parents involved in an adoption need to be ever mindful of their language.
  2. Jessalynn and I have been in communication privately. That’s all that needs to be said about that.
  3. The original post and all of the comments remain in its entirety. I have no plans of deleting or editing it. However, it is not available for public consumption. As I told Jessalynn, “Our words must stand or fall of their own accord. What unfolded in the comments section of that blog post is an important part of the record. What I said in the original post is an important part of the record, even if I did handle it like a bull in a china shop.”

As stated in my last post to Jessalynn, this is not about any one “winning.” My apology to her does not mean she wins, her changing her profile does not mean I win. It isn’t a contest, it is about doing what is right for all of our children.

Linda, Kara, Christina, Joy, Jenn, Amanda, Liz, Emily, Whit, Melanie, Laura, Julie, Von, Jeff, Jennifer, and all of the other adoptees who have been so fierce with the truth: Thank you for teaching me what is right.

Dear JS: Part II

Dear JS –

Wow. I didn’t intend for things to get so….out of hand? My original post about your mormon.org profile was a response from the 20-year old version of me that is still coming to terms with the fact that I allowed my religious culture to convince me I was not good enough and would never be good enough to parent my first daughter.  It came from the 39-year old version of me has done every thing right according to LDSFS and yet I am still left with the disenfranchised grief brought about by the ambiguous loss of my daughter.  It came from the part of me that feels betrayed by a church and culture that promised me adoption would bless my family and me into the eternities.

Obviously, if you read the letters I have written to my oldest daughter, you will discover we are all still waiting for those promised blessings.  But that’s a different matter entirely – that’s not what this letter is about. This letter is about repentance and learning from a situation that what went from not so nice, to bad, to ugly rather quickly.

First, let me publicly apologize for the methods I used in drawing attention to the wording of your mormon.org profile. I acknowledge it was a heavy-handed approach; I unleashed on you the ire I have towards organizations such as LDSFS and the NCFA who have institutionalized magical thinking among natural parents (and adoptive families as well).  I am sorry for the approach I took in conveying what I had to say, because it wasn’t about you necessarily, it was really about the organizations that taught you to think so little of yourself, that taught you to belittle your status as your first daughter’s mother. You are so much more than what you have been sold by LDSFS and FSA, Jessalynn, so very much more. The tactics I used are certainly not something I am terribly proud of having done. However, the message is something from which I will never back down: How natural mothers use words to frame our experience profoundly affects our children’s ability to heal from the ambiguous loss that adoption brings into their life.

So with that apology in place, please let me try to deliver this message again. Let me speak to you as a woman, a mother, a sister in the Gospel, and a fellow natural mother.

I understand what you were trying to convey in your mormon.org profile. Your second daughter is the first one you have had the great honor of parenting.  I get it. I really do.  Been there done that, have the t-shirt. However, there is no reason to bend the truth to make you or others around you feel better about the tremendous loss you have endured when you placed your first daughter for adoption. I urge you to step into the headwinds and face the fierceness of the Truth. It is not an easy thing to do. I have lived it. However, your honesty with yourself and your daughters about their true birth order and the irreplaceable role each plays in your life will forge deeper channels of love and respect between all of you.

Perhaps it is because you are young, so very young, that you were not able to hear the pleas of adult adoptees begging you to reconsider how you present your daughter to the world. Perhaps as you age and mature, you will come to see the weight your words carry in your daughter’s face. Words matter. A lot. Our children will never outgrow the need to hear from our own mouths they are valued, important, and irreplaceable parts of our lives. Just as we long for it from our own parents, your daughters will crave your honor and esteem, an esteem that recognizes them not just a “birth” child or a “kept” child but simply as your child.

As your relationship with your first daughter’s adoptive family continues to grow, please try to be mindful the blessings of open adoption are purchased with the tears of millions of women who have suffered untold amounts of grief when they lost their children to adoption. More importantly, your open adoption is built on the millions of shattered hearts of adoptees who came before your daughter, human beings who have never stopped loving and longing for their natural parents, even if they deeply love and respect their adoptive ones, too. When you speak so casually of your first daughter’s birth order and her rightful place in your life, it diminishes the sacrifice and suffering of those who lost everything so you could have something with your daughter.  I urge you to listen to what these adult adoptees are trying to teach women like us – women who have lost our oldest daughters to adoption.

Your decision to change your profile does not equal a “win” point on the scoreboard. This is not about winning. We have both lost, Jessalynn. You lost your precious daughter. I lost mine. Our daughters lost us as the mother that raises them, they lost their original heritage and identity, their inheritance. It isn’t about me or you winning, it is about trying to do what is right for these children who had no say in the matter.

Sincerely,

M.

At the request of Jessalynn, I have removed the previous post for public consumption. I have not deleted it entirely, but it is now password protected so that only myself and my husband can access it.

I will explain the reasons why later this afternoon once I get a free moment from the life so many people accuse me of not having. Until then, please know that I apologized to Jessalynn for the tone of my comments and she has changed her mormon.org profile.

Sincerely,

M.

P.S. I have closed the comments, removed the offending comments (about me or Jessalynn), and will not allow any more to be published. Enough already, OK?