I’m Not into Banning Books, but Some Books Need to Go Away


A while ago, a dear friend asked if I had a particular book in my personal library. I emphatically told this friend NO, I did not have it and exclaimed this book should just go away. I am not typically into banning books, but there is one book in particular that will NEVER be on my shelves ever again.miracle_forgivenessMore than any other book I have read or will likely read in my lifetime, this book was the catalyst to the near-destruction of my already broken heart. It was a death-knell to my spiritual, emotional, and mental health. In my “old age,” I am not shy about telling people how I feel about this book and the devastating effect it had in my life, damage that reverberates through generations and into the eternities.

Back to my friend, though.

After I told her I didn’t have the book, she borrowed it from another church member who did have it. She read it, then reported back to the bishop about it. My friend also mentioned to our bishop my feelings about the book, to which he replied I most likely felt that way because of past sins or errors in my life. Setting aside the breach of trust and confidentiality on both my friend and bishop’s part, I felt a need to explain myself and perhaps illuminate his understanding about the damaging nature of this book.

I share with you parts of the letter I wrote to him regarding my strong feelings about this book and its effect on my life [edited for grammar, because I was in a bit of a tizzy when I wrote it]. Perhaps it might help others understand the cultural context and time in which my lost daughter was conceived and born.

When I look back on the string of events in my life, beginning in August 1989 when my sister died until April 1993 when I signed the TPR, I am astounded I survived.  Especially with ecclesiastical leaders like I had at that point in time, leaders who blamed me for rape and didn’t believe the abuse allegations, either. Leaders who told me  relinquishing my daughter for adoption was an outward sign I had truly repented of premarital sex, who said if I *really* loved her, I would let her go to a two-parent home. Leaders who told me I was being selfish for wanting to raise my daughter.

I think it is fair to say I *totally* lost the leadership lottery, LDS-style, over and over and over again during those years.

______________________________________________

Dear SW –

[My BFF] told me that she talked with you yesterday and shared with you how I feel about the book, “The Miracle of Forgiveness.” She then reported you said I felt that way because my past sins and mistakes made me feel “uncomfortable” with it (or something like that). I wanted to clarify my negative feelings towards the book have NOTHING to do with MY past sins and mistakes, but EVERYTHING to do with the message sent to rape and incest victims.

Let me set the scene for you: My natural father molested me. In Young Women’s, when virtue was discussed as a value, THE VERY FIRST scriptural reference is one regarding the rape of Nephite women (see https://www.lds.org/young-women/personal-progress/virtue?lang=eng as well as Mormon 9:9).

Now, our ADULT brains and reasoning can understand that whomever selected a scripture about rape causing a loss of chastity and virtue for THE VERY FIRST REFERENCE didn’t intend to harm, but merely to make an illustration. However, as a young woman who had suffered mightily at the hands of my father who “deprived” me of my chastity and virtue, this cut like a knife and sent a message that I HAD DONE SOMETHING WRONG by allowing it to be taken from me.

Fast forward three years. I was 17. The Relief Society President’s 27-year old son raped me. My sister had just died and my parents marriage was imploding with the revelation of my father’s sexual abuse of his daughters, so I turned to a man I thought I could trust for help, my bishop. Do you want to know what he did? He didn’t call the police. He didn’t report the man for rape of a minor. He didn’t tell my parents. He put ME on probation and had ME read “The Miracle of Forgiveness.” His reasoning was that I MUST be responsible for my “part” in the rape. Imagine the soul-crushing effect it was to read these words, penned by a not-yet-prophet:

“Also far-reaching is the effect of loss of chastity. Once given or taken or stolen it can never be regained. Even in a forced contact such as rape or incest….It is better to die in defending one’s virtue than to live having lost it without a struggle.” ( p. 196)

“President David O. McKay has pleaded: Your virtue is worth more than your life. Please, young folk, preserve your virtue even if you lose your lives.” (p. 63)

“…one should give his or her life rather than to yield to loss of virtue.” (p. 66)

So…according to [Spencer W. Kimball, eventual prophet and leader of the LDS church,] I should have DIED before I “let” my father molest me. I should have DIED before I “let” a 27-year old man rape me.

Just to make sure the message was driven home that I WAS AT FAULT FOR THE RAPE, I was not allowed to graduate from seminary and I was also denied my Young Womanhood medallion, even though I had done EVERYTHING to earn it and had done NOTHING wrong except willed myself to LIVE instead of dying from the abuse and rape.

It has taken YEARS of therapy to forgive that bishop and to forgive myself for being a naive and trusting 17 year old. Obviously I should have gone to the police instead of my bishop with the rape. Instead of reading the Miracle of Forgiveness, a rape kit should have been done. Instead of banning me from seminary graduation and denying me my medallion, I should have been testifying against the man who raped me. But none of that happened because in that book, a not-yet-prophet said I should have died instead of “letting” my virtue be FORCIBLY TAKEN FROM ME. This same thinking is what lead Elizabeth Smart to stay with her kidnappers until she was rescued. She had been taught the same things, taught the she was a chewed piece of gum and should have fought to the death before she “let” that man rape her.

My adult mind now understands virtue is NOT the same as virginity. My virtue – or in other words my goodness, righteousness, morality, integrity, dignity, honor, decency, respectability, nobility, worthiness, and purity – CANNOT be forcibly taken from me or from any other rape or molestation victim. The book, “The Miracle of Forgiveness”  **VERY** plainly says that it can and THAT is what I take exception to. [Those passages perpetuate] the fallacy that if a woman is raped and lives to tell about it, she was asking for it and is somehow at fault.

Sincerely,

M.

Advertisements

13 thoughts on “I’m Not into Banning Books, but Some Books Need to Go Away

      • I’ve known you a long time now and still can’t understand how you remain a member of a church which can be so abusive. That’s a rhetorical question and a comment more than something that needs answering. ❤

      • Well . . .for the most part, I am not any more. I am not officially “out” (i.e., requested my name be removed from the records), but I have taken a year long brake from attending and don’t ever see myself going back. Just trying to figure out how to navigate my marriage and other important relationships in a post-Mormon world, especially as many of my loved ones remain deeply committed to the LDS church. Fortunately, those who know my story at the deepest levels have been nothing but supportive, gentle, and loving towards me as I go through this faith transition, my husband in particular.

  1. Dear Mylinda,

    This was a very powerful entry. In my women and gender studies class we recently read an excerpt from Jessica Valenti’s, “The Purity Myth”. In it she argues that women’s virtue is not situated between her legs. This particular letter Ms. Feverfew follows well on the heals of some of the discussions we had. Some of the young women in the class that come from staunch religious backgrounds were having trouble separating their chastity with their virtue. This letter might prove helpful in demonstrating how damaging it can be to a young woman to be forced to conflate the two.

    May I share this entry with my class?

    Pamela in Illinois David (1973), 1st phone contact 8/11/2013 Mark (1974), 1st email 1/2004, 1st F2F5/2012

    >

    • You are so kind, Rebecca, for reading something I know was not easy for you to read. I hold no ill will towards SWK as I have come to realize that not everything a prophet says or pens is revelation. I just wish I had known that when I was 17.

  2. Ew. I’m surprised I made it through that without losing my lunch. I am so thankful I never read that book.
    You continue to amaze me! You are one of the strongest people I know!
    Much love to you, my friend!

  3. Very glad to hear you’ve had gentle and loving support. I see how hard it must be and as always wish you well and love your persistence and strength in the face of so much. I know there must be tough times but they’re not the only times. ❤

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s